Best Electric Cars · EVCar Data Desk
Volvo EX90 vs Toyota C-HR: EPA Range and Recall Comparison for 2027 EVs
Between the 2027 Volvo EX90 with 21-inch wheels and standard 2WD, and the 2027 Toyota C-HR AWD with 18-inch wheels, both electric SUVs have nearly identical EPA range ratings. The Volvo EX90 offers a slightly longer rated range of 291 miles, versus the Toyota C-HR's 287 miles.
Key Findings
- The Volvo EX90 2WD EPA range is 291 miles, slightly ahead of the Toyota C-HR AWD at 287 miles.
- The Toyota C-HR AWD excels in efficiency with a combined rating of 117 MPGe, outperforming the Volvo’s 98 MPGe.
- City and highway MPGe ratings favor the Toyota C-HR, with 127 MPGe city and 107 MPGe highway compared to Volvo's 104 MPGe city and 91 MPGe highway.
- Charging times differ, with the Volvo EX90 requiring around 10 hours for a full 240V charge, longer than the Toyota C-HR’s 8 hours.
- Neither vehicle has recorded any NHTSA recalls as of 2026.0 recalls for Toyota C-HR and 0 recalls for Volvo EX90.
EPA Range Comparison
The main range advantage is marginal, with the Volvo EX90 2WD just edging out the Toyota C-HR AWD by 291 miles versus 287 miles. This small difference implies both vehicles are well-suited for daily driving and moderate trips without frequent recharging.
Efficiency Ratings and What They Mean
Efficiency, measured in MPGe (miles per gallon equivalent), indicates how far the vehicle can travel electrically per unit of energy. The Toyota C-HR AWD has superior efficiency across combined, city, and highway cycles, with combined MPGe of 117 compared to the Volvo's 98. This means the Toyota converts battery energy into miles more effectively, which can lower overall electricity costs with typical use patterns.
City vs. Highway Efficiency
Both models show better efficiency in city driving compared to highway, but the Toyota's lead is consistent. It achieves 127 MPGe in city conditions and 107 MPGe on the highway, while the Volvo scores 104 MPGe city and 91 MPGe highway. Buyers with primarily urban driving needs might find the C-HR's strong city efficiency especially attractive.
Charging Times and Convenience
Level 2 charging times differ notably: the Volvo EX90 needs approximately 10 hours to fully charge at 240V, while the Toyota C-HR charges faster, in about 8 hours. Faster charging can be a decisive factor for users relying on overnight or workplace Level 2 chargers.
Recall and Safety Considerations
Neither vehicle has reported any recalls in the NHTSA database as of the latest data, with both at 0 recalls for the Toyota C-HR and 0 recalls for the Volvo EX90. This clean record suggests no current widespread safety defects, which is a positive note for prospective buyers prioritizing reliability and safety.
Which Vehicle Fits Your Needs?
If you prioritize slightly longer range and don’t mind longer charge times or lower efficiency, the Volvo EX90 2WD offers a robust option with just a few more miles per charge. Conversely, drivers who favor higher electrical efficiency and quicker charging times with all-wheel drive capability will appreciate the Toyota C-HR AWD’s advantages, especially for mixed or urban driving.
Summary Table of Key Specifications
| Specification | Volvo EX90 2WD (21" wheels) | Toyota C-HR AWD (18" wheels) |
|---|---|---|
| EPA Range | 291 miles | 287 miles |
| Combined MPGe | 98 MPGe | 117 MPGe |
| City MPGe | 104 MPGe | 127 MPGe |
| Highway MPGe | 91 MPGe | 107 MPGe |
| 240V Charge Time | 10.00 hours | 8.00 hours |
| NHTSA Recalls | 0 recalls | 0 recalls |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which vehicle has the longer EPA range?
The Volvo EX90 2WD has a slightly longer EPA range at 291 miles compared to the Toyota C-HR AWD’s 287 miles.
Which EV is more energy efficient?
The Toyota C-HR AWD is more efficient, boasting a combined 117 MPGe over the Volvo’s 98 MPGe.
Do either of these SUVs have any recalls?
No, both the Volvo EX90 2WD and Toyota C-HR AWD have no NHTSA recalls reported as of the latest data.
How do their charging times compare?
The Toyota C-HR charges faster on a 240V Level 2 charger, taking about 8 hours, while the Volvo EX90 requires about 10 hours.
Which one is better for city driving efficiency?
The Toyota C-HR’s city MPGe is higher at 127 MPGe compared to the Volvo’s 104 MPGe, making it the better choice for urban efficiency.
Conclusion: Choosing Between Two Competent Electric SUVs
Both the 2027 Volvo EX90 2WD and Toyota C-HR AWD deliver competitive EPA range capabilities suitable for most daily needs. The Volvo slightly outperforms in range, but the Toyota C-HR offers superior efficiency and faster charging, which may reduce operating costs and improve convenience. With no recalls reported for either, safety concerns are minimal as per current records. Buyers prioritizing range might lean toward the Volvo, while those focused on efficiency and quicker recharging could prefer the Toyota.
Data Sources
- EPA Vehicle Fuel Economy Data: EPA Official Data
- NHTSA Recall Data: NHTSA API
